lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87fz5rorq4.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer)
Subject: Teen hacker controls ebay

* ?ber GuidoZ:

> I believe it was done through email. DENIC received the request to
> change the DNS, then emailed Tucows to see if it was ok to make the
> changes. By default, the answer is yes. So, since no one responded
> saying "Hell no! Don't do that", the changes were made.
>
> Personally, I can't comprehend how the default for something like that
> would be "Yes", as it's easy to have email get lost, stopped as spam,
> overlooked, etc.

Network Solutions is being slammed because they recently made the
default "no". 8-/

> The default answer should be No, which you have to change by an
> email.

That's why many registrars answer with an automated "no" (which can be
overridden manually if necessary during the next couple of weeks).

> (Not that it's difficult to spoof an email address... hence why DNS
> changes and such should NEVER be done through email.)

Nowadays, all messages should be signed with OpenPGP.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ