full-disclosure - OT: Re: ZIP Attachment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <414E1709.6000006@brvenik.com>
From: security at brvenik.com (Jason)
Subject: OT: Re: ZIP Attachment

Mr. Nick FitzGerald:

--- quote ---

 >
 > And yes, I deliberately chose to send this to the list as many others
 > here have the same habit (though getting duplicates of non-pointless
 > Email is generally nowhere near as annoying as getting two of GuidoZ'
 > rubbish).
 >
 >
--- quote ---

I like to be copied directly on threads. I have a MUA capable of 
highlighting mail sent directly to me so I do not have to read through 
hundreds of messages to find the topics I am clearly interested in, they 
just appear at the top. I also have the ability to filter duplicates so 
who cares? If you are that concerned about it please use an appropriate 
header to indicate your desire instead of a reply-to. If you cannot 
afford the few extra pence for some duplicates perhaps you should not be 
online.

You are too up tight. The guy was attempting to be helpful and you get 
on him like he is some ignorant pest. He even used google which is a 
great start at finding information and far more than people on this list 
bother to do most of the time.

What meaningful assistance or information did you provide beyond the 
initial identification mail? Mmmmmkayyy STFU and enjoy the day please. 
Your constant pissing and moaning is nothing but a nuisance and causes 
some really intelligent people to never bother joining in on a chat or 
providing potentially useful information for fear of dealing with a 
shite like you. I have had my moments too but I hope they were never as 
inconsiderate as you have been.

I think you are being the pest, if you do not like the posts in an open 
forum then read the headers of the _list_ copy of this mail you will 
ultimately receive. There is even a moderated version of the list 
available where your drivel is surely to get scrapped along with this 
message.

Extra bandwidth is intentional.

Nick FitzGerald wrote:

> GuidoZ wrote:
> 
> <<blah, blah, blah>>
> 
> Look idiot -- would you please stop CC'ing me these messages?
> 
> If you are using such a shite MUA that your only option to 
> automatically get it to reply to the list address is to use some poxy 
> "reply all" function, please stop replying.  If that is the case and 
> you just _must_ reply (we're all still waiting anxiously to see a 
> single sentence worth reading actually come from your keyboard) then 
> please edit the address fields so that my direct address is NOT among 
> them.  Much as receiving your drivel through the list is a nuisance 
> waste of bandwidth and time, receiving a second copy of it direct is 
> outright annoying.
> 
> This list is "self-" or "auto-" moderated, meaning that it 
> automatically accepts message from subscribers' addresses.  Thus, if 
> you post from a subscribed address (as you clearly do) there is no need 
> whatsoever to CC someone when _replying_ to their message as they are 
> almost necessarily on the list.
> 
> Please desist this stupid and annoying habit forthwith.
> 
> And yes, I deliberately chose to send this to the list as many others 
> here have the same habit (though getting duplicates of non-pointless 
> Email is generally nowhere near as annoying as getting two of GuidoZ' 
> rubbish).
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Nick FitzGerald
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>