lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <BAY22-F32Wwr2UAaTzv000038ea@hotmail.com> From: sixsigma98 at hotmail.com (Ray P) Subject: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 The last Windows OS that had that problem, as I recall, was the original release of Windows 95. MS issued a patch and said they never thought someone would leave a computer turned on that long. Maybe this "Windows server" is actually running on Windows 95? Kind of sounds par for the gov. Ray >From: Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com> >To: joe <mvp@...ware.net> >CC: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com >Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 >Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:47:14 +0300 > >On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 09:28:08AM -0400, joe wrote: > > Nod. Some knucklehead used GetTickCount or clock() for their app and had >no > > clue about datatypes and overflows and range of possible values and some > > people go off on Windows. > > > >joo, > >are you speaking for m$? > >the article clearly states: > >" Microsoft told Techworld it was aware of the reports but was not >immediately >able to comment." > >you know that "not able to comment" basically means "screwed" ? > >-- >where do you want bill gates to go today? > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists