full-disclosure - Paranid ramblings - what's the deal? Bounded variables aren't?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b7bc1b1f04100516511b9d7022@mail.gmail.com>
From: uberguidoz at gmail.com (GuidoZ)
Subject: Paranid ramblings - what's the deal? Bounded variables aren't?

> Subject: NDN: [Full-Disclosure] Shows when no limits are set or restricted shell or bat ac
> 
> Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
> 
> tycho,IC&S (The name was not found at the remote site. Check that the name
> has been entered correctly.)

Yeah, I get this too. (In fact I wrote to the list about it as well,
including to the moderator quite some time ago.) I've simply setup a
filter to auto-delete it (among the 30 other "Out of office" replies,
dead email addresses, and auto-responders).

Some advice: Do not have mailing lists go to an email address with an
auto-responder. Period. As for the invalid email addresses, I'd hope
that the mods would prune the database now and then to remove them.
(It's entirely possible they never see such addresses, however all
they have to do is send a message to the list and see the returned
emails themselves.)

For now, best I can recommend is to setup a rule/filter to delete it
automatically.

--
Peace. ~G

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:48:59 -0400, Clairmont, Jan M
<jan.m.clairmont@...igroup.com> wrote:
> Every time I send out a memo to full-disclosure i get this this mail bounce message and
> it gets posted on full-disclosure.  Anybody have an idea what's happening.
> 
> Message Follows:
> 
> From: Mailer-Daemon@...s.nl
> 
> Subject: NDN: [Full-Disclosure] Shows when no limits are set or restricted shell or bat ac
> 
> Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
> 
> tycho,IC&S (The name was not found at the remote site. Check that the name
> has been entered correctly.)
> 
> Are these guys phishing, swishing or whatever Netherlands uber alles?
> Or is this just their mail-server barfing?  Should probably point dig at it
> and debug it but I have gotten in trouble for that type of "help" before?
> 
> Keep on computing, even though your bytes are fried.
> 
> Jan Clairmont, Paladin of the Dept. of Insecurity Department, where no redundancy is allowed or is it redundancy is required, have to look that up in the book of insecurity security chapter 4 verse 3(The bible of the Mad Arab Adulah Medula, taken from
> the NecronoMicron or the latest M$ directorate).
> 
> Unix Security Support/Consultant I think?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>