lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <addc34c6041112071345f516a6@mail.gmail.com>
From: nocmonkey at gmail.com (Danny)
Subject: IE is just as safe as FireFox

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 01:50:45 -0500, David B Harris
<dbharris@...f.ddts.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:18:55 -0500
> Danny <nocmonkey@...il.com> wrote:
> > Yes, IE security needs work. Yes, Firefox is a great web browser.
> >
> > However, if Firefox or any other browser had the same market share as
> > IE, would it really be that much more secure? There sure would be a
> > lot more people trying to find holes in Firefox if it had the same
> > user base.
> 
> ... because as soon as you hit 50% marketshare, the quality of the code
> which has been written and distributed instantaneously and magically
> drops and order of magnitude ...
> 
> </sarcasm>

It's a simple concept. The more people use something, the more flaws
are exposed.

Especially if there ARE more flaws, lol. IE is doomed because of its
integration with Microsoft software and its feature set.

(See my last post for more info).

...D


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ