lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <addc34c604111207071b6538ec@mail.gmail.com>
From: nocmonkey at gmail.com (Danny)
Subject: IE is just as safe as FireFox

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:22:26 -0600, Frank Knobbe <frank@...bbe.us> wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 18:18, Danny wrote:
> > However, if Firefox or any other browser had the same market share as
> > IE, would it really be that much more secure?
> 
> Wrong question.

It's part of the equation. May not be the biggest part, but it is a factor. 

Based on everyones feedback, I would say the following kills IE's security:

1) Features
2) Features
3) ActiveX / Active Scripting
4) It's marriage with the OS
5) It's market share
6) It's marriage with so many other MS applications

Yes, from a security point of view, this is very bad. Fundamentally,
Microsoft is in trouble with IE and security. Who the hell would be
able to secure a web browser with so much integration and features?
The only hope in hell anyone would have securing IE, is by removing
the list crap list above.

...D


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ