lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20041112211530.GB32578@mars-attacks.org>
From: boklm at mars-attacks.org (nicolas vigier)
Subject: IE is just as safe as FireFox

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Danny wrote:

> 
> Yes, IE security needs work. Yes, Firefox is a great web browser.
> 
> However, if Firefox or any other browser had the same market share as
> IE, would it really be that much more secure? There sure would be a
> lot more people trying to find holes in Firefox if it had the same
> user base.

Yes, IIS security needs work. Yes, Apache is a great web server.

However, if Apache or any other web server had the same market share as
IIS, would it really be that much more secure ? There sure would be a
lot more people trying to find holes in Apache if it had the same user
base.

Wooops. Netcraft tells us that 67% webservers are running Apache while 21%
running IIS. Why are there so much worms targeting IIS and not so much
for Apache ?

The truth is that some programs have a bad design for security while
some others have a better one. A good program will not have a lot of
vulnerabilities even with a lot of users, a bad program will have a lot
of known vulnerabilities even with not a lot of users.

There are aldready a lot of people looking for holes in Mozilla, I don't
think we'll see a lot of changes if 90% people start using it.

-- 
gpg fp: 8a7e 9719 b38d 97c6 6af0  d345 12a0 3708 2c8c 3c11
http://boklm.mars-attacks.org/


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ