full-disclosure - OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.61.0411141743000.6781@dave.horsfall.org>
From: dave at horsfall.org (Dave Horsfall)
Subject: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Paul Schmehl wrote:

> Every person's vote counts the same.  Just because you don't comprehend 
> the electoral college doesn't mean that a vote doesn't count.

Let me see if I have this right, as this could well be a computer security 
issue (the reported discrepancies between the exit polls and the actual 
vote, with an interesting correlation to the actual vote-recording box 
used in that area).

Or doesn't the statistical bell-curve work here?

You don't vote for your beloved leader (as they do in some places).  You 
don't even vote for your beloved party (as they do in Britain and 
Australia, the former being where I was born and the latter being where I 
live).

Instead, you vote for a bunch of people who will vote on your behalf, 
usually by ignoring the popular vote and casting it 100% for their party.

What did I miss?

-- Dave