full-disclosure - OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87brdzulvb.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer)
Subject: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

> Sorry list, I just couldn't resist......
>
> *Electoral votes vs. Population [1]
>
> State    Population Votes  Votes / M pop.
> -----------------------------------------
> Alaska      648,818   3        4.624
> Wyoming     501,242   3        5.985
> Texas    22,118,509  34        1.537
> ....
>
> I guess you must have missed that day in elementary 
> school when they covered this.  Pretty simple huh???
>
> Are you happy that a Wyoming voter has 3.89 times the 
> political power you do????

The problem isn't so much the weighting (it's even more extreme in the
senate), but the "the winner gets it all" principle adopted in most
states.  This means that both election campaigns do not care a bit
about states like Texas where a ten percent swing in one direction or
the other simply has no net result.