[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20041115165554.GA5280@netpublishing.com>
From: ggilliss at netpublishing.com (Gregory Gilliss)
Subject: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.
OT. Don't want to hear it. Try Orkut or somewhere else.
G
On or about 2004.11.15 17:18:16 +0000, Florian Weimer (fw@...eb.enyo.de) said:
> > Sorry list, I just couldn't resist......
> >
> > *Electoral votes vs. Population [1]
> >
> > State Population Votes Votes / M pop.
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Alaska 648,818 3 4.624
> > Wyoming 501,242 3 5.985
> > Texas 22,118,509 34 1.537
> > ....
> >
> > I guess you must have missed that day in elementary
> > school when they covered this. Pretty simple huh???
> >
> > Are you happy that a Wyoming voter has 3.89 times the
> > political power you do????
>
> The problem isn't so much the weighting (it's even more extreme in the
> senate), but the "the winner gets it all" principle adopted in most
> states. This means that both election campaigns do not care a bit
> about states like Texas where a ten percent swing in one direction or
> the other simply has no net result.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
--
Gregory A. Gilliss, CISSP E-mail: greg@...liss.com
Computer Security WWW: http://www.gilliss.com/greg/
PGP Key fingerprint 2F 0B 70 AE 5F 8E 71 7A 2D 86 52 BA B7 83 D9 B4 14 0E 8C A3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists