full-disclosure - OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: streck at papafloh.de (Florian Streck)
Subject: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 12:02:16PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> >
> >Instead, you vote for a bunch of people who will vote on your behalf,
> >usually by ignoring the popular vote and casting it 100% for their party.

No. The problem with the system is that the relation between the votes a
state has in the presidetial election and the number of inhabitants of
this state differs between the states. So it's possible for a candidate
that has less votes to become president. Even without fraud.
> >
> The entire thing.  We *do* vote for the leader we want.  Just read the 
> Federalist Papers if you want to understand how the American political 
> system works and why it's designed the way that it is.

Wasn't the reason for the Electors that at that time it was not
practicable to make a direct election due to the great distances in
America?
> 
> Again, this has nothing to do with security, so stop filling up the list 
> with it.

Why stop the people from leraning?

Florian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041115/8df67918/attachment.bin