full-disclosure - OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <FD72D622222EC0C48FF68C6C@utd49554.utdallas.edu>
From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Paul Schmehl)
Subject: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

--On Monday, November 15, 2004 10:32:21 PM +0100 Florian Streck 
<streck@...afloh.de> wrote:
>
> No. The problem with the system is that the relation between the votes a
> state has in the presidetial election and the number of inhabitants of
> this state differs between the states. So it's possible for a candidate
> that has less votes to become president. Even without fraud.

This is not a "problem".  It is the result of a conscious decision.
>
> Wasn't the reason for the Electors that at that time it was not
> practicable to make a direct election due to the great distances in
> America?

No, it was to avoid the dangers of democracy.
>
> Why stop the people from leraning?
>
Because this is the wrong forum.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu