full-disclosure - OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200411161908.iAGJ8Z9M022438@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. 

On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 22:32:21 +0100, Florian Streck said:

> Wasn't the reason for the Electors that at that time it was not
> practicable to make a direct election due to the great distances in
> America?

No, the concern was that people out in the boonies might be ignorant
hicks who would vote for a bad choice because they didn't have much
exposure to either candidate's viewpoints.  So they added the Electoral
College as a safety net (presuming that the actual electors would have
more information about all the candidates...)

Now can we get back to *security* issues, like "Is a Diebold hackable
by a chimpanzee?" :)

(Personally, I'm convinced that there *was* fraud on *both* sides, but
not enough to actually *provably* sway the end result for President, so
we need to move on and start thinking about how to make 2008 a *tough*
election to hack - and *that* discussion *is* on topic here.. ;)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041116/647eb78b/attachment.bin