[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f198c3041119064573edf3c4@mail.gmail.com>
From: kenneth.d.ng at gmail.com (Kenneth Ng)
Subject: [in] Re: IE is just as safe as FireFox
In my opinion, there are two defintions for "integrated". For most
people, it means "a" works with "b". For Microsoft, it means "a" can
not work without "b". Firefox is definitelyl the former because I use
it both under Linux and under Windows, and I'm trying to get it to
work on my Zaurus.
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:57:31 +0100, Borja Marcos <borjam@...enet.es> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> >> Could you please define "integrated"? English isn't my primary
> >> language...
> >
> > Integrated is similar to saying "is part of" or "united". For future
> > reference (and more info), Google can also be extremely handy in such
> > a case. Doing a Google search for:
>
> :-D
>
> Thanks. I thought that it had more meanings :-D
>
> Given that Firefox is integrated in Linux... ?Will I be able to use
> Linux wthout Firefox? Or, ?is Firefox an operating system module? Being
> Linux a kernel... Is Firefox a kernel module? :-D (That was the whole
> point, I didn't mark the sarcasm correctly, though).
>
> Borja.
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
>
> iD8DBQFBne29ULpVo4XWgJ8RAk6RAKC3Hz6S+UgXwYFStdQ+vx+UdmSrIQCgygLV
> g5eqzYciEFUG8h+/MtLm9Go=
> =ZaI2
>
>
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists