full-disclosure - irc legaility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAnZzC1sycEUaOmQ12cQMLosKAAAAQAAAAy6F1/ureo0iQFuuNaFMBwwEAAAAA@loststryker.net>
From: loststryker at loststryker.net (Simon Lorentsen)
Subject: irc legaility

Hi guys / gals,

Had a conversation tonight, and have been reading the IRC threads and
wondered if anyone could answer the following.

In the following scenario; you are a business, is IRC logs of conversations
and lists of hosts be help up in a court of law if a client you spoke to
refused to pay or hold up the end of a bargain or agreement, and is faxing a
document (no hard copies sent via post) accepted as a legal document in a
court of law.

I appreciate any help you can give.

Regards

Simon Lorentsen

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.797 / Virus Database: 541 - Release Date: 15/11/2004

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041120/94c96c92/attachment.html