| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <682E3868-3C18-11D9-A0C0-000D93C0F38C@teknovis.com> From: andfarm at teknovis.com (Andrew Farmer) Subject: irc legaility On 19 Nov 2004, at 17:22, Simon Lorentsen wrote: > In the following scenario; you are a business, is IRC logs of > conversations and lists of hosts be help up in a court of law if a > client you spoke to refused to pay or hold up the end of a bargain or > agreement, and is faxing a document (no hard copies sent via post) > accepted as a legal document in a court of law. I'm no lawyer, but I'd seriously doubt it, especially as plain-text logs can easily be falsified. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041121/3e533278/PGP.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists