full-disclosure - Re: signatures for Oracle Alert 68

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20041124134856.22375.qmail@web52204.mail.yahoo.com>
From: karmic_nirvana at yahoo.com (nirvana)
Subject: Re: signatures for Oracle Alert 68

Well an interesting idea is network based patching
systems. The solution to this problem is to have a
technology using which you can achieve the same effect
as patching a server but without actually patching the
server physically. Something like a network based
patching system.
The technology is highly effective in precisely
emulating (detection -> sanitization -> response) as
if the application patches (as if applied locally,
Oracle too). It's being worked out by a company. You
may see it in market next year around.

--- "Antonio Javier G. M." <legion@...rramedia.org>
wrote:

> We need signatures for IDS/IDP for Oracle's alert
> 68.
> How can we protect against these attacks if we can
> not apply patches in some 
> platforms? 
> 
> Any interesting ideas? 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter:
> http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 

__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com