full-disclosure - Re: signatures for Oracle Alert 68

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200411241830.iAOIUf1c015738@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Re: signatures for Oracle Alert 68 

On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:54:31 +0100, "Antonio Javier G. M." said:

> We really know what are we talking about. Please, use google to search for 
> IDP or IPS technologies and snortinline. 

And *I* know as well - if you *READ* what I said:

> Just a reminder for everybody and the archives - unless you're using some sort
> of firewall appliance that doesn't pass a packet that triggers a signature,
> having a signature doesn't actually protect you. 

In other words, it's a WARNING to those who *DONT* know the difference
between IDP/IPS and an IDS.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041124/a656db9e/attachment.bin