full-disclosure - Fwd: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d4322ab804112413326557b4b4@mail.gmail.com>
From: sutpen at gmail.com (Thomas Sutpen)
Subject: Fwd: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida

I forgot to make sure everybody else has a chance to view my remarks
to Barry's obviously short-sighted arguments.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Thomas Sutpen <sutpen@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:31:49 -0700
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers Challenge Bush
Win In Florida
To: bkfsec <bkfsec@....lonestar.org>


On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:02:41 -0500, bkfsec <bkfsec@....lonestar.org> wrote:
> So anyone who is concerned about the system and has shown that they
> aren't on your side of the political fence should have their opinion
> sumarily tossed out?

I never said what side of the fence I'm on.  You, however, have made
it more than amply clear where you are.  You've already shown your
hand, and like it or not, you're be labelled accordingly.

> Well, since you so clearly have shown your own allegiance, wouldn't the
> case be the same for you?  Thanks for the opening.
>
> Everyone, please disregard Thomas' opinions - he's shown himself to not
> be impartial.

This coming from you.  Sorry, that doesn't wash.