lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: bkfsec at (bkfsec)
Subject: Fwd: University Researchers Challenge Bush
 Win In Florida

I wanted to make sure that everybody else has a chance to view my 
remarks to Thomas' obviously unintelligable gripe with me, while we're 
being immature and foolish here.  Why break the chain, right?

Thomas, if you're going to pick a fight, please pick one you can handle 
with a modicum of grace.  I tried to take this offlist, but you insist 
on dragging it back on... very sad. 

Maybe you feel that your non-argument with regard to me can only be 
bulstered by slanderous personal attacks.  I can play that game, too.  
Have a nice day.  :)

Thomas Sutpen wrote:

>I forgot to make sure everybody else has a chance to view my remarks
>to Barry's obviously short-sighted arguments.
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>From: Thomas Sutpen <>
>Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:31:49 -0700
>Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers Challenge Bush
>Win In Florida
>To: bkfsec <>
>On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:02:41 -0500, bkfsec <> wrote:
>>So anyone who is concerned about the system and has shown that they
>>aren't on your side of the political fence should have their opinion
>>sumarily tossed out?
>I never said what side of the fence I'm on.  You, however, have made
>it more than amply clear where you are.  You've already shown your
>hand, and like it or not, you're be labelled accordingly.
You seem to be ashamed of who you are.  That's a pity.  :)

Label me however you like.  I really could care less.  I've shown my 
hand? :)  That's pretty funny.

>>Well, since you so clearly have shown your own allegiance, wouldn't the
>>case be the same for you?  Thanks for the opening.
>>Everyone, please disregard Thomas' opinions - he's shown himself to not
>>be impartial.
>This coming from you.  Sorry, that doesn't wash.
Sure it washes.  In fact, it washes so much that the irony of my sarcasm 
was entirely lost on you.

Pity... maybe you should read a little bit more closely next time.  I 
can talk to some people and maybe recommend a remedial level reading 
class for you.  I'd have to look pretty far, though - no one I know does 
such a poor job as to require the remedial class you seem to need.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists