full-disclosure - Fwd: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: bkfsec at sdf.lonestar.org (bkfsec)
Subject: Fwd: University Researchers Challenge Bush
 Win In Florida

I wanted to make sure that everybody else has a chance to view my 
remarks to Thomas' obviously unintelligable gripe with me, while we're 
being immature and foolish here.  Why break the chain, right?

Thomas, if you're going to pick a fight, please pick one you can handle 
with a modicum of grace.  I tried to take this offlist, but you insist 
on dragging it back on... very sad. 

Maybe you feel that your non-argument with regard to me can only be 
bulstered by slanderous personal attacks.  I can play that game, too.  
Have a nice day.  :)

Thomas Sutpen wrote:

>I forgot to make sure everybody else has a chance to view my remarks
>to Barry's obviously short-sighted arguments.
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>From: Thomas Sutpen <sutpen@...il.com>
>Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:31:49 -0700
>Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers Challenge Bush
>Win In Florida
>To: bkfsec <bkfsec@....lonestar.org>
>
>
>On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:02:41 -0500, bkfsec <bkfsec@....lonestar.org> wrote:
>  
>
>>So anyone who is concerned about the system and has shown that they
>>aren't on your side of the political fence should have their opinion
>>sumarily tossed out?
>>    
>>
>
>I never said what side of the fence I'm on.  You, however, have made
>it more than amply clear where you are.  You've already shown your
>hand, and like it or not, you're be labelled accordingly.
>  
>
You seem to be ashamed of who you are.  That's a pity.  :)

Label me however you like.  I really could care less.  I've shown my 
hand? :)  That's pretty funny.

>  
>
>>Well, since you so clearly have shown your own allegiance, wouldn't the
>>case be the same for you?  Thanks for the opening.
>>
>>Everyone, please disregard Thomas' opinions - he's shown himself to not
>>be impartial.
>>    
>>
>
>This coming from you.  Sorry, that doesn't wash.
>
>  
>
Sure it washes.  In fact, it washes so much that the irony of my sarcasm 
was entirely lost on you.

Pity... maybe you should read a little bit more closely next time.  I 
can talk to some people and maybe recommend a remedial level reading 
class for you.  I'd have to look pretty far, though - no one I know does 
such a poor job as to require the remedial class you seem to need.

         -Barry