full-disclosure - University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <41A55AC5.8030202@myself.gen.nz>
From: steve at myself.gen.nz (Steve Wray)
Subject: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In
 Florida

Todd Towles wrote:
> Did the charter say something about political messages?..please take it
> off the list guys if possible...

Actually, I thought that particular post was in the spirit of the list...

It seemed to me to address technologies and methodologies.

I didn't think that it dwelled on party political issues. Though, to be 
honest, I think Paul should have sent that last one just to the 
addressee not to the list. But he does come up with some gems so he 
won't go on my plonkers list :)

If you want to be truly pedantic as to what counts as political, well... 
there wouldn't be much to choose from. Everything is politics if you 
squint hard enough.

I find the best method of dealing with full disclosure is that every 
time you see someone post something you consider off topic or a troll or 
whatever suits your taste, simply filter their address out.

Filtering by subject doesn't help much as trolls will post to *anything* 
but trolls *will* post. So as long as I filter out anyone that seems 
like a troll (or otherwise an idiot) full disclosure comes up with some 
gems.

And the best part is that if someone on your plonker list says something 
genuinely interesting, they will doubtless be quoted by someone else so 
you may still get to read it. And the list has an archive.

Without filters I'd have left FD years ago...

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com 
>>[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of 
>>Paul Schmehl
>>Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:22 AM
>>To: Jason Coombs; Gregory Gilliss; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
>>Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers 
>>Challenge Bush Win In Florida
>>
>>--On Wednesday, November 24, 2004 05:39:31 AM +0000 Jason 
>>Coombs <jasonc@...ence.org> wrote:
[massive snip]