[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9E97F0997FB84D42B221B9FB203EFA274D3781@dc1ms2.msad.brookshires.net>
From: toddtowles at brookshires.com (Todd Towles)
Subject: Fwd: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida
Well thanks for trying to pull it off the list...lol
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of bkfsec
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 2:49 PM
> To: Thomas Sutpen
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers
> Challenge Bush Win In Florida
>
> I wanted to make sure that everybody else has a chance to
> view my remarks to Thomas' obviously unintelligable gripe
> with me, while we're being immature and foolish here. Why
> break the chain, right?
>
> Thomas, if you're going to pick a fight, please pick one you
> can handle with a modicum of grace. I tried to take this
> offlist, but you insist on dragging it back on... very sad.
>
> Maybe you feel that your non-argument with regard to me can
> only be bulstered by slanderous personal attacks. I can play
> that game, too.
> Have a nice day. :)
>
>
> Thomas Sutpen wrote:
>
> >I forgot to make sure everybody else has a chance to view my remarks
> >to Barry's obviously short-sighted arguments.
> >
> >
> >---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >From: Thomas Sutpen <sutpen@...il.com>
> >Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:31:49 -0700
> >Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers Challenge Bush
> >Win In Florida
> >To: bkfsec <bkfsec@....lonestar.org>
> >
> >
> >On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:02:41 -0500, bkfsec
> <bkfsec@....lonestar.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>So anyone who is concerned about the system and has shown that they
> >>aren't on your side of the political fence should have their opinion
> >>sumarily tossed out?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I never said what side of the fence I'm on. You, however, have made
> >it more than amply clear where you are. You've already shown your
> >hand, and like it or not, you're be labelled accordingly.
> >
> >
> You seem to be ashamed of who you are. That's a pity. :)
>
> Label me however you like. I really could care less. I've shown my
> hand? :) That's pretty funny.
>
> >
> >
> >>Well, since you so clearly have shown your own allegiance,
> wouldn't the
> >>case be the same for you? Thanks for the opening.
> >>
> >>Everyone, please disregard Thomas' opinions - he's shown
> himself to not
> >>be impartial.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >This coming from you. Sorry, that doesn't wash.
> >
> >
> >
> Sure it washes. In fact, it washes so much that the irony of
> my sarcasm
> was entirely lost on you.
>
> Pity... maybe you should read a little bit more closely next time. I
> can talk to some people and maybe recommend a remedial level reading
> class for you. I'd have to look pretty far, though - no one
> I know does
> such a poor job as to require the remedial class you seem to need.
>
> -Barry
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists