lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: toddtowles at brookshires.com (Todd Towles)
Subject: Fwd: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida

Well thanks for trying to pull it off the list...lol 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com 
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of bkfsec
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 2:49 PM
> To: Thomas Sutpen
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers 
> Challenge Bush Win In Florida
> 
> I wanted to make sure that everybody else has a chance to 
> view my remarks to Thomas' obviously unintelligable gripe 
> with me, while we're being immature and foolish here.  Why 
> break the chain, right?
> 
> Thomas, if you're going to pick a fight, please pick one you 
> can handle with a modicum of grace.  I tried to take this 
> offlist, but you insist on dragging it back on... very sad. 
> 
> Maybe you feel that your non-argument with regard to me can 
> only be bulstered by slanderous personal attacks.  I can play 
> that game, too.  
> Have a nice day.  :)
> 
> 
> Thomas Sutpen wrote:
> 
> >I forgot to make sure everybody else has a chance to view my remarks
> >to Barry's obviously short-sighted arguments.
> >
> >
> >---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >From: Thomas Sutpen <sutpen@...il.com>
> >Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:31:49 -0700
> >Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] University Researchers Challenge Bush
> >Win In Florida
> >To: bkfsec <bkfsec@....lonestar.org>
> >
> >
> >On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:02:41 -0500, bkfsec 
> <bkfsec@....lonestar.org> wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>So anyone who is concerned about the system and has shown that they
> >>aren't on your side of the political fence should have their opinion
> >>sumarily tossed out?
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >I never said what side of the fence I'm on.  You, however, have made
> >it more than amply clear where you are.  You've already shown your
> >hand, and like it or not, you're be labelled accordingly.
> >  
> >
> You seem to be ashamed of who you are.  That's a pity.  :)
> 
> Label me however you like.  I really could care less.  I've shown my 
> hand? :)  That's pretty funny.
> 
> >  
> >
> >>Well, since you so clearly have shown your own allegiance, 
> wouldn't the
> >>case be the same for you?  Thanks for the opening.
> >>
> >>Everyone, please disregard Thomas' opinions - he's shown 
> himself to not
> >>be impartial.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >This coming from you.  Sorry, that doesn't wash.
> >
> >  
> >
> Sure it washes.  In fact, it washes so much that the irony of 
> my sarcasm 
> was entirely lost on you.
> 
> Pity... maybe you should read a little bit more closely next time.  I 
> can talk to some people and maybe recommend a remedial level reading 
> class for you.  I'd have to look pretty far, though - no one 
> I know does 
> such a poor job as to require the remedial class you seem to need.
> 
>          -Barry
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists