full-disclosure - Multiple Backdoors found in eEye Products (IRIS and SecureIIS)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <41D3D2B8.2010504@xmcopartners.com>
From: fcharpen at xmcopartners.com (Frederic Charpentier)
Subject: Multiple Backdoors found in eEye Products (IRIS
	and SecureIIS)

Hi.
does anyone confirm the info ?

Fred.

Lance Gusto wrote:

> Multiple Backdoors found in eEye Products (IRIS and SecureIIS)
> L. Gusto <thegusto22@...mail.com>
> 
> 
> Summary:
> 
> During meticulous testing of both eEye's IRIS and SecureIIS products,
> we (my testing team) have discovered multiple backdoors in the latest of
> both mentioned products and some older versions we could acquire.
> 
> 
> These backdoors are very cleverly hidden (kudos to the authors), I
> personally don't condone illegally backdooring commercial products,
> and personally I don't think much of eEye but I must give credit to
> where credit is due.
> 
> 
> We have tested IRIS 3.7 and up they all appear to have a backdoor.
> We have verified the IRIS backdoor doesn't exist in versions prior
> to 3.0
> 
> 
> We have tested SecureIIS 2.0 and up they all appear to have a backdoor.
> We have verified that SecureIIS 1.x series does not have this specific
> backdoor.
> 
> Bringing the backdoors to light:
> 
> After long testing we discovered the exact sequences used to active
> the backdoor. Unfortunately, we can't release the "exploits" publically
> due to the severity of these flaws. But incomplete examples will
> be given.
> 
> 
> 
> The IRIS Backdoor:
> 
> This one is quite interesting. We have discovered that sending a
> specifically crafted UDP datagram to a IRIS host *directly* (not
> through the wire or to host on the network segment) with certain IP
> options set and a certain magic value at a undisclosed offset in the
> payload will bind a shell to the source port specified in the UDP datagram.
> 
> [snip]
> 
> 
> The SecureIIS Backdoor:
> 
> The SecureIIS backdoor was alot easier to discover but very well
> placed. The SecureIIS backdoor is triggered by a specifically
> crafted HTTP HEAD request. Here is a incomplete layout of how
> to exploit this:
> 
> 
> HEAD /<24 byte constant string>/PORT_ADDRESS.ASP HTTP/1.1
> 
> PORT         - Will be the port to bind a shell.
> ADDRESS        - Address for priority binding (0 - For any).
> 
> 
> [snip]
> 
> 
> 
> Local Deduction:
> 
> There are a two possiblilites here, either eEye's code has been
> altered by some attacker or this has been sanctioned by the
> company (or at least the developers were fully aware of this).
> 
> 
> 
> Conclusion:
> 
> It is very very shameful that a somewhat reputable like eEye is acting
> in a very childish, unprofessional manner. I figure that is why the
> code is closed source. There are several active exploits available that I
> (the author of this advisory) didn't create floating around. The only
> logical solution will be to not use the mentioned eEye products for the
> time being or at least downgrade to the non-backdoored versions.
> 
> We will be investigation eEye's Blink Product for any clandestine 
> backdoors.
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar ? get it now! 
> http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 

-- 
_______________________________________
Frederic Charpentier - Xmco Partners
Security Consulting / Pentest
web  : http://www.xmcopartners.com