lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20050103130812.Y41653@ubzr.zsa.bet>
From: measl at mfn.org (J.A. Terranson)
Subject: [inbox] Re: This sums up Yahoo!s securitypolicy
	to a -T-


On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Exibar wrote:

> Yes I am aware that the laws differe from state to state.  This would be a
> federal case, a US Federal case, if it ever got that far, it won't.

You wanna explain how you came to this brilliant conclusion?  How is an
estate issue federal?

>  No
> IANAL, but have first hand knowledge of a case very similliar to this.

Stop watching TV.

> Digital property and physical property are considered the same in cases like
> this.  It is something owned by the deceased.  It becomes the property of
> the inheritor.

I hope your "consulting practice" doesn't hand out opinions like this.


>   No I cannot cite case law to back up my statements.

Then you are making this shit up as you go.


>   If someone were to die without a will, and their
> parents/wife/husband/kids/ etc are the legal hiers, wouldn't they also
> inherit that person's ameritrade stock broker account, or at least
> everything inside said account?  Why is e-mail different?

So, here you are asking questions that show you don't have a clue, after
telling us how you *know*...  Just stop trying to be the One Source Of
Knowledge, and STFU when you don't know what you're talking about.

>
>  Exibar


-- 
Yours,

J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@....org
0xBD4A95BF

 Civilization is in a tailspin - everything is backwards, everything is
upside down- doctors destroy health, psychiatrists destroy minds, lawyers
destroy justice, the major media destroy information, governments destroy
freedom and religions destroy spirituality - yet it is claimed to be
healthy, just, informed, free and spiritual. We live in a social system
whose community, wealth, love and life is derived from alienation,
poverty, self-hate and medical murder - yet we tell ourselves that it is
biologically and ecologically sustainable.

The Bush plan to screen whole US population for mental illness clearly
indicates that mental illness starts at the top.

Rev Dr Michael Ellner

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ