[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20050103192235.GC1698@hyper>
From: gadgeteer at elegantinnovations.org (gadgeteer@...gantinnovations.org)
Subject: Re: Insecurity in Finnish parlament (computers)
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 08:49:38PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 14:34:24 GMT, James Tucker said:
> > not possible. This is not to say that communications don't get
> > monitored, it is just to say that the report of 'everything you say is
> > being watched' is quite simply false.
>
> Maybe it is all being watched, and maybe it isn't. A bit of thought shows
> that acting as if it is all watched is the only sane way to behave - if you
> know only 10% is watched, but can't tell *which* 10%, there's only one
> thing to do....
google "Semantic Forests"
--
Chief Gadgeteer
Elegant Innovations
Powered by blists - more mailing lists