full-disclosure - Microsoft AntiSpyware: Will it be free and Vulnerable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <41E41214.4040502@easynix.net>
From: devis at easynix.net (devis)
Subject: Microsoft AntiSpyware: Will it be free and
	Vulnerable

Matt Ostiguy wrote:

>On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:12:23 -0600, RandallM <randallm@...mail.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>I don't think it's going to be free. While doing a small amount of research
>>on the "spyware community" I found this text string in the
>>GianttAntiSpywareUpdater.exe:
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Doesn't the fact that the executable's name contains a company that no
>longer exists (Giant) indicate that perhaps this BETA software will
>undergo some changes before its full release as a Microsoft product?
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>
>  
>
Buahwuahwuahwuawa ... you have to be gullible to think that M$ will not 
NOT cash on their own slack coding. Of course they will, now i suspect 
they even will try to make it go as an added cost for the OEMs, so 
consummers will pay transparently for one year signatures updates ... as 
they do/did for OSes.
Remember .. they never had a choice in the first place, why would they now ?