| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200501251747.j0PHlgen017129@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: hushmail.com, is this true? On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:22:25 CST, Bart.Lansing@...ls.com said: > How hard is it to verify this yourself by, as has been suggested > elsewhere, signing up and sending yourself an email? Not to overly harsh > your mellow, but the solution to getting this information is not exactly > ocket science... Figuring out what correlating information is in the headers of the mail isn't rocket science. Figuring out what correlating information is left in the various logfiles on the hushmail servers *is* rocket science for those who aren't hushmail staff. In fact, I'm fairly sure that "hushmail tells you what is in their logfiles" is the only legal way to do it (of course, getting them to tell you will likely require the use of a subpoena or other legalistic blunt weapon...) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050125/06ffe94e/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists