| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200501261738.j0QHc47H021560@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: hushmail.com, is this true? (Libraries, The Patriot Act, Forcoing Issues Etc.) (RAL for some) On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 03:31:22 PST, Steve Kudlak said: > The question I would like is what level of "paranoia" should we be at? > Right now most people still believe enough in the US in the Bill or > Rights in the US and other protections elsewhere that no one is getting > really bent out of shape and invokes any special protections to avoid > danger? The question is should they do so? And if so is there a "Plug > and Play" PGP or something equaslly as good. Right now people seem > to want ease of use a lot and ignore much of the protection already > available to them. Most people are sheep. That's it, plain and simple. It's why things like the Patriot Act are allowed to happen, and why up to 80% of all computers are infected with malware. Yes, they *should* get bent out of shape and all the rest. No, they won't. (And yes, it's on-topic - any site security policy that doesn't recognize that people are sheep and work within those constraints is doomed to fail...) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050126/184edeb7/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists