[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1107980075.679.55.camel@localhost>
From: frank at knobbe.us (Frank Knobbe)
Subject: Administrivia: List Compromised due to
Mailman Vulnerability
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 15:01 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> > To prevent getting lulled into a phishing scam, could you please confirm
> > the fingerprints of the self-signed SSL certificate that mailman is
> > running on? :)
>
> Bonus points if the fingerprint is in a mail that's digitally signed, so we
> know the phisher isn't faking the mail....
>
> Hand me some more tinfoil, will ya? :)
heh... nah, having John look at the cert and say "Yup, that's mine" is
enough of a trust-level for me. (On the other hand, if he says "Oh
shit!" then the verification step has served its purpose :)
Cheers,
Frank (who knows he's being watched ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050209/f6d14bc5/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists