full-disclosure - Microsoft to buy Sybari AV company

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <420A6F4A.50101@sdf.lonestar.org>
From: bkfsec at sdf.lonestar.org (bkfsec)
Subject: Microsoft to buy Sybari AV company

Danny wrote:

>On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:51:16 +0100 (CET), Feher Tamas
><etomcat@...email.hu> wrote:
>  
>
>>http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-5567529.html
>>
>>GeCad RAV, GIANT and now Sybari Antivirus. Microsoft
>>swallows smaller anti-malware firms one by one. When the
>>last one is gone, MS will probably eat the larger ones, too.
>>Finally all kind of desktop and server security will be
>>owned by MS and W.H.G. III will rule.
>>    
>>
>
>The hidden message behind all of these acquisitions that Microsoft
>doesn't want you to know:  Microsoft is admitting their software is
>horribly insecure and their solution to the problem is to acquire
>re-active based anti-malware software to cleanup the crap that got in
>because their software has more holes than the screen in my patio
>door.
>
>  
>

Not to mention that they reportedly plan on charging for this software 
eventually.

Question: if they're profiting from their insecurity through the sales 
of anti-malware software, then what impetus do they have to actually fix 
anything?

If you said "No impetus at all", you'd be correct.

             -Barry