full-disclosure - Re: Xfree86 video buffering?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1109362620.32122.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
From: joel.esler at rcert-s.army.mil (Esler, Joel CNTR/Sytex)
Subject: Re: Xfree86 video buffering?

While I agree that his is an issue.  However I don't feel it's a
security issue.  It's more a "fix the driver damn it issue"...  

If you can go through all the trouble to set up a camera, or physically
sit and see a few seconds worth of XFree Blink..  You most likely have
physical access anyway.  

Physical Access = root.

Fix the driver.  End of story.

On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 22:58 +0300, phased wrote:

> If someone has access to your machine, and can make it crash so they can see
> what you were doing, someone mentioned this is local infomation disclosure...
> they could just look over your shoulder while you were using the machine or 
> install a mini camera someplace in the room, zoom in on your monitor and
> acheive much better results.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stan Bubrouski <stan.bubrouski@...il.com>
> To: "Riad S. Wahby" <rsw@...t.org>
> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:33:21 -0500
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Xfree86 video buffering?
> 
> > 
> > Riad S. Wahby wrote:
> > 
> > >Stan Bubrouski <stan.bubrouski@...il.com> wrote:
> > >  
> > >
> > >>Umm I didn't offer a solution at all? 
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >
> > >Are you making a statement or asking a question?
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > Umm more like wondering what you're talking about.
> > 
> > >>I clearly said I wasn't wise enough to devise a solution for this...
> > >>which is why I said I'll leave a solution to the experts...
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >
> > >It's fairly obvious that you either have to do it at shutdown or at
> > >startup.  When else are you going to do it, while the user is viewing
> > >the screen?
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > I wasn't making a case for either argument.
> > 
> > >Also, you seem to have taken my email as a personal attack.  Calm down,
> > >dude.  I was participating in a discussion, not holding up a giant "Stan
> > >is stupid" sign.
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > Go ahead and hold up a sign doesn't bother me, if it did I wouldn't be 
> > posting to public mailling lists.
> > But if you think I'm sitting here steaming about it your barking up the 
> > wrong tree :-P
> > 
> > I think you're simply inferring too much from what I'm saying.  That's all.
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > 
> > sb
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

-- 
Esler, Joel CNTR/Sytex <joel.esler@...rt-s.army.mil>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050225/42860f95/attachment.html