[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <428DD2D7.6010605@tvog.net>
Date: Fri May 20 15:16:41 2005
From: laszlof at tvog.net (Frank Laszlo)
Subject: Security benefits of spliting services between
two ISP providers
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
>On Wed, 18 May 2005 09:14:56 EDT, Frank Laszlo said:
>
>
>>You never really want to utilize 100% of your bandwidth, you should
>>always have some "extra" bandwidth "just in case." Sure, there are costs
>>involved, but as a business, surely one could make the decision on
>>whether or not to push it as an expense, or take the risk of only having
>>1 connection. I personally wouldnt split the services between the two
>>ISPs, I would simple have another connection for those "just in case"
>>situations. If a business relies heavily on internet, you shouldnt be
>>worried about a few extra bucks for a redundent connection. Just my 2 cents.
>>
>>
>
>When a "few extra bucks" is $2,000/month, you start looking at it differently.
>
>(NetworkVirginia commercial pricing is $1175/mo for a T-1 (1.5mbits), and if the
>original poster has 3mbits/sec, it's 2 T-1s. So $2,000/mo isn't just a wild-ass
>guess).
>
>
You really have to put it into perspective. $2,000/mo to a small company
is a lot of money, sure. But overall, any medium to large size company
will find it a very small investment for an even greater return. The
return being redudency. Which is why i said it woulc be a corporate
decision to make such an investment. If they company can afford it, By
all means they should.
Regards,
Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists