full-disclosure - Security benefits of spliting services between two ISP providers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200505200242.j4K2gDEZ010123@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri May 20 03:42:26 2005
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Security benefits of spliting services between
	two ISP providers 

On Wed, 18 May 2005 09:14:56 EDT, Frank Laszlo said:
> You never really want to utilize 100% of your bandwidth, you should 
> always have some "extra" bandwidth "just in case." Sure, there are costs 
> involved, but as a business, surely one could make the decision on 
> whether or not to push it as an expense, or take the risk of only having 
> 1 connection. I personally wouldnt split the services between the two 
> ISPs, I would simple have another connection for those "just in case" 
> situations. If a business relies heavily on internet, you shouldnt be 
> worried about a few extra bucks for a redundent connection. Just my 2 cents.

When a "few extra bucks" is $2,000/month, you start looking at it differently.

(NetworkVirginia commercial pricing is $1175/mo for a T-1 (1.5mbits), and if the
original poster has 3mbits/sec, it's 2 T-1s. So $2,000/mo isn't just a wild-ass
guess).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050519/2411fc92/attachment.bin