full-disclosure - Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20050727090109.K75285@ubzr.zsa.bet>
Date: Wed Jul 27 15:03:49 2005
From: measl at mfn.org (J.A. Terranson)
Subject: Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Adam Jones wrote:

> What exactly is wrong with this? I personally would rather have 3com
> buying up exploits (probably under an agreement for exclusive access)
> instead of having them sold to the highest, probably malicious,
> bidder.

Your argument amounts to "The lesser of two evils", which is NOT the same
as ethical behaviour.

> Even if someone sells it to both there is a more reputable
> group that has the exploit and can help with mitigation.

"Reputable"?  I'm sorry, we must have different opinions as to what
constitutes "reputable".  A "reputable" company does not encourage the
writing of malware for money, or the withholding of information from the
community (FD) in exchange for mere personal gain.

-- 
Yours,

J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@....org
0xBD4A95BF

"A stock broker is someone who handles your money until its all gone."
Diana Hubbard (of Scientology fame)