[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e92364c305072707534025c90a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed Jul 27 15:53:09 2005
From: jftucker at gmail.com (James Tucker)
Subject: Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired
Who cares.
No discussion of this topic has EVER reached a conclusion, mostly
because poeple are too pig headed to ever even try and agree with each
other.
IMO - Drop it.
On 7/27/05, J.A. Terranson <measl@....org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Adam Jones wrote:
>
> > What exactly is wrong with this? I personally would rather have 3com
> > buying up exploits (probably under an agreement for exclusive access)
> > instead of having them sold to the highest, probably malicious,
> > bidder.
>
> Your argument amounts to "The lesser of two evils", which is NOT the same
> as ethical behaviour.
>
> > Even if someone sells it to both there is a more reputable
> > group that has the exploit and can help with mitigation.
>
> "Reputable"? I'm sorry, we must have different opinions as to what
> constitutes "reputable". A "reputable" company does not encourage the
> writing of malware for money, or the withholding of information from the
> community (FD) in exchange for mere personal gain.
>
> --
> Yours,
>
> J.A. Terranson
> sysadmin@....org
> 0xBD4A95BF
>
>
> "A stock broker is someone who handles your money until its all gone."
> Diana Hubbard (of Scientology fame)
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists