lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <e92364c305072707534025c90a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed Jul 27 15:53:09 2005 From: jftucker at gmail.com (James Tucker) Subject: Our Industry Is Seriously Ethics Impaired Who cares. No discussion of this topic has EVER reached a conclusion, mostly because poeple are too pig headed to ever even try and agree with each other. IMO - Drop it. On 7/27/05, J.A. Terranson <measl@....org> wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Adam Jones wrote: > > > What exactly is wrong with this? I personally would rather have 3com > > buying up exploits (probably under an agreement for exclusive access) > > instead of having them sold to the highest, probably malicious, > > bidder. > > Your argument amounts to "The lesser of two evils", which is NOT the same > as ethical behaviour. > > > Even if someone sells it to both there is a more reputable > > group that has the exploit and can help with mitigation. > > "Reputable"? I'm sorry, we must have different opinions as to what > constitutes "reputable". A "reputable" company does not encourage the > writing of malware for money, or the withholding of information from the > community (FD) in exchange for mere personal gain. > > -- > Yours, > > J.A. Terranson > sysadmin@....org > 0xBD4A95BF > > > "A stock broker is someone who handles your money until its all gone." > Diana Hubbard (of Scientology fame) > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists