lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <BAY106-F3693E28A7D53305036F73BC0C10@phx.gbl> Date: Sat Jul 30 16:19:55 2005 From: dan_20407 at msn.com (DAN MORRILL) Subject: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial CiscoSecurity Presentation >From what I understand (I am writing a major paper on Intellectual Property Protection right now, the Joy of being a student) the creator of the data has the direct right under Title 17 and the DMCA to determine how the data will be used (hence expiring CDR's and DRM). If data is sent in error that does not limit or otherwise reduce the rights of the data owner, and the data owner can request that the data be removed. The data owner can also request assurances that the data has been removed from all parties that they believe have copies of that data. Cisco in their message has acted according to American law by requesting that all copies of the data that is held in private hands be deleted as they are the acting IP owners along with ISS. Cisco is acting as the agent of the IP owner (much like RIAA and MPAA do for artists and movie makers). Their request is quite legal, and at least they were polite about it. If anyone wants more data on this subject (which is way off topic for FD), I can provide it separately or as private conversation. Regards, Dan Sometimes MSN E-mail will indicate that the mesasge failed to be delivered. Please resend when you get those, it does not mean that the mail box is bad, merely that MSN mail is over worked at the time. >From: Daniel <deeper@...il.com> >Reply-To: Daniel <deeper@...il.com> >To: Russell Smoak <rsmoak@...co.com> >CC: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk, nanog@...it.edu, >fergdawg@...zero.net >Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial >CiscoSecurity Presentation >Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 00:24:33 +0100 > >This raises an interesting point, if intellectual property is sent in >error, do any of the laws pertaining to said property apply 100% or is >there a weird shift of how they are applied? > > > > > >On 7/29/05, Russell Smoak <rsmoak@...co.com> wrote: > > All, > > > > These recipients received an email from Austin Mckinley as Cisco >Systems. > > > > This messasge was sent in complete error and includes intellectual > > property of ISS and Cisco Systems. Please delete and do not distrbute > > the information any further. > > > > If you have any quesitons, please contact the Cisco PSIRT team. > > > > > > Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > > > > > -- > > Russell Smoak <rsmoak@...co.com> > > Sr. Manager, PSIRT > > Customer Assurance Programs > > c i s c o S y s t e m s > > Phone: 615-791-0972 > > Cell: 615-545-6473 > > _______________________________________________ > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > >_______________________________________________ >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists