full-disclosure - <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial CiscoSecurity Presentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20050730185154.GA13285@sivokote.iziade.m$>
Date: Sat Jul 30 19:50:58 2005
From: guninski at guninski.com (Georgi Guninski)
Subject: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial
	CiscoSecurity Presentation

On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 03:19:47PM +0000, DAN MORRILL wrote:
> >From what I understand (I am writing a major paper on Intellectual 
> >Property 
> Protection right now, the Joy of being a student) the creator of the data 
> has the direct right under Title 17 and the DMCA to determine how the data 
> will be used (hence expiring CDR's and DRM).
> 
> If data is sent in error that does not limit or otherwise reduce the rights 
> of the data owner, and the data owner can request that the data be removed. 
> The data owner can also request assurances that the data has been removed 
> from all parties that they believe have copies of that data. Cisco in their 
> message has acted according to American law by requesting that all copies 
> of the data that is held in private hands be deleted as they are the acting 
> IP owners along with ISS. Cisco is acting as the agent of the IP owner 
> (much like RIAA and MPAA do for artists and movie makers).
> 
> Their request is quite legal, and at least they were polite about it.
>

oh, the first puppy on this thread iirc.

can you broadcast your message to outside usa jurisdiction, preferably via
paid commercials?

-- 
where do you want bill gates to go today?