lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20050730185154.GA13285@sivokote.iziade.m$> Date: Sat Jul 30 19:50:58 2005 From: guninski at guninski.com (Georgi Guninski) Subject: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversial CiscoSecurity Presentation On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 03:19:47PM +0000, DAN MORRILL wrote: > >From what I understand (I am writing a major paper on Intellectual > >Property > Protection right now, the Joy of being a student) the creator of the data > has the direct right under Title 17 and the DMCA to determine how the data > will be used (hence expiring CDR's and DRM). > > If data is sent in error that does not limit or otherwise reduce the rights > of the data owner, and the data owner can request that the data be removed. > The data owner can also request assurances that the data has been removed > from all parties that they believe have copies of that data. Cisco in their > message has acted according to American law by requesting that all copies > of the data that is held in private hands be deleted as they are the acting > IP owners along with ISS. Cisco is acting as the agent of the IP owner > (much like RIAA and MPAA do for artists and movie makers). > > Their request is quite legal, and at least they were polite about it. > oh, the first puppy on this thread iirc. can you broadcast your message to outside usa jurisdiction, preferably via paid commercials? -- where do you want bill gates to go today?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists