full-disclosure - <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's controversialCiscoSecurity Presentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <005301c59540$2ca2a7b0$231a90d8@honeypot>
Date: Sat Jul 30 20:53:51 2005
From: geoincidents at nls.net (Geo.)
Subject: <Cisco Message> Mike Lynn's
	controversialCiscoSecurity Presentation

> >From what I understand (I am writing a major paper on Intellectual
Property
> Protection right now, the Joy of being a student) the creator of the data
> has the direct right under Title 17 and the DMCA to determine how the data
> will be used (hence expiring CDR's and DRM).

This is incorrect as far as title 17 goes, copyright only gives control over
making copies and public performance, there must be a contract for any
additional restrictions. See http://www.theyscrewedusagain.com if you want
some good info for your paper. I would suggest you take a look specifically
at the quote from the 1908 congress that extended copyright law to cover
music as well, pretty interesting stuff.
http://www.theyscrewedusagain.com/copyrightact1909.htm

Geo.