full-disclosure - Re: Help put a stop to incompetent computer forensics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <42FAA2B8.9040401@science.org>
Date: Thu Aug 11 01:57:44 2005
From: jasonc at science.org (Jason Coombs)
Subject: Re: Help put a stop to incompetent computer
	forensics

Donald J. Ankney wrote:
> Your definition is just a subset of the standard, broader one. 

When a word causes widespread misunderstanding such that you simply 
can't use it to communicate ideas clearly, the old meaning becomes 
archaic. I think that's what has happened with Trojan. Proof of this can 
be found in the list of malware that anti-Trojan software is designed to 
detect -- without double-checking this, just from memory, I'm going to 
say that the list of malware detected by the typical anti-Trojan 
software product is limited to malware that meets my definition and does 
not include the broader definition. That causes a real problem, in 
practice, since if the anti-Trojan doesn't stop spyware then how can 
spyware be a Trojan?

Regards,

Jason Coombs
jasonc@...ence.org