[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OFEBLDLMAEGNIOHKPMKBIEGFCAAA.hummer@domeranger.com>
Date: Thu Aug 11 00:42:50 2005
From: hummer at domeranger.com (hummer@...eranger.com)
Subject: Re: Help put a stop to incompetent
computerforensics
Can we agree that in the world of computer security the Trojan horse is a
malicious program disguised as a legitimate software and let it go at that?
Thanks
Hummer Marchand, GCIH,CISSP CompTIA Security+
-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk]On Behalf Of Donald J.
Ankney
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 5:20 PM
To: jasonc@...ence.org
Cc: Full-Disclosure; Thierry Zoller
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Help put a stop to incompetent
computerforensics
Wikipedia:
In the context of computer software, a Trojan horse is a malicious program
that is disguised as legitimate software. The term is derived from the
classical myth of the Trojan horse. In the siege of Troy, the Greeks left a
large wooden horse outside the city. The Trojans were convinced that it was
a gift, and moved the horse to a place within the city walls. It turned out
that the horse was hollow, containing Greek soldiers who opened the city
gates of Troy at night, making it possible for the Greek army to pillage the
city. Trojan horse programs work in a similar way: they may look useful or
interesting (or at the very least harmless) to an unsuspecting user, but are
actually harmful when executed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojan_horse_%28computing%29
Your definition is just a subset of the standard, broader one.
On Aug 10, 2005, at 3:43 PM, Jason Coombs wrote:
foofus@...fus.net wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:26:23AM +0200, Thierry Zoller wrote:
The industry definition is perfectly within Homers defintion of a
Trojan
horse.
JC> http://classics.mit.edu/Homer/iliad.html
When I read Homer, it was a Greek horse.
The horse became the property of the Trojans before it launched its
hidden attack, but your point is interesting as well.
There are other terms used to describe malware disguised as something
else that has hidden capability to cause damage. Logic bomb, for example.
I'll do some more work on this and see where it leads. The proposal of
"backdoor" as the better term just doesn't work, since a backdoor is a
hidden mechanism for gaining entry or control of a system that is built into
the system by its creator or some other involved party. An intruder may open
up a backdoor in a system by altering its programming rather than by
planting a Trojan, so there needs to be a distinction between the two.
Cheers,
Jason Coombs
jasonc@...ence.org
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20050810/3361e59f/attachment-0001.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists