Message-ID: <fdb3980a050824183064aa62f2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu Aug 25 02:31:05 2005
From: mohit.muthanna at gmail.com (Mohit Muthanna)
Subject: talk.google.com

They sure do: http://www.google.com/talk/developer.html

Plans for SIP support; and "Service Choice" (Starting with EarthLink).

Mohit.

On 8/24/05, Clement Dupuis <cdupuis@...ure.org> wrote:
>  
>  
> 
> They must have plan to add VOIP on top of it later on.  They can then sell
> incoming and outgoing call like Skype 
> 
>   
> 
> Clement 
> 
>   
>  
> 
>   
> 
> From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk
> [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On
> Behalf Of Andrew Smith
>  Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 6:48 AM
>  To: Stuart Carter
>  Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
>  Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] talk.google.com 
>  
> 
>   
> 
> I was just pondering as to how they will serve advertisements, ads on I.M.
> isn't the done thing and I can't see it being accepted. Honestly, I think a
> targetted ad would be pretty good on I.M., I'm talking about a concert with
> a friend and *bam* up pops a link to cheap tickets for that concert. But I
> can't see them getting away with that, I suppose it will just be used as a
> draw to their Gmail service? 
>  
> 
> On 8/24/05, Stuart Carter <Stuart.Carter@...el.co.uk > wrote: 
> 
> Google will make money off it the way they usually do - by providing a
> useful service, based on open source and open standards, and use it as a
> conduit to deliver advertising :)
>  
>  I hadn't thought of the Skype connection - but it *does* make sense when
> you think about it. Plus, it's another poke in the eye to Microsoft - "hey,
> Microsoft! We have just launched our IM service and already have more users
> than you! Neener neener!" (or something along those lines).
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  Stuart Carter
>  IT Dept.
>  0131 311 5281
>  Mobile: 0709 204 5442
>  This message is confidential. If it is not for you, please inform us
> immediately and then delete it. The author (not the author's employer) is
> responsible for any opinions in the message.
>  
>  
>  >>> Andrew Smith <andrew.rse@...il.com> 24/08/2005 10:51 >>>
>  Interesting,
>  http://www.google.com/talk/otherclients.html especially,
> giving you other
>  options.
>  How could they possibly make a profit off this? I guess it's just an
>  extension to gMail which they will certainly make a profit with. 
>  Perhaps they're trying to beat skype on the VOIP market?
>  
>  
>  
>  On 8/24/05, Stuart Carter <Stuart.Carter@...el.co.uk> wrote:
>  >
>  > Hey ho - more opportunites for people to happily surrender their privacy!
>  >
>  > But it's just another jabber server - one that I will not be using, but
>  > will no doubt attract Joe Sixpack as usual.
>  >
>  > Personally I find GAIM and GAIM-encryption to be a happy combination :) 
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > (email disclaimer disclaimer - I am not responsible for the disclaimer,
>  > but will apologise for it anyway!)
>  >
>  
>  
>  
>  Achieving the BBCEL Vision to be: -
>  'The Contractor Of Choice' 
>  
>  By demonstrating Values that InSpire:
>  Integrity - Safety - Passion - Innovation - Respect - Excellence
>  
>  This email may contain information which is confidential and is intended
> only for use of the recipient/s named above.  If you are not an intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any copying, distribution,
> disclosure, reliance upon or other use of the contents of this email/fax is
> strictly prohibited.   If you have received this email in error, please
> notify the sender and destroy it. 
> 
>   
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter:
> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> 
> 


-- 
Mohit Muthanna [mohit (at) muthanna (uhuh) com]
"There are 10 types of people. Those who understand binary, and those
who don't."

Powered by blists - more mailing lists