full-disclosure - Suggestion for IDS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20050929103954.69F089DF@lists.grok.org.uk>
Date: Thu Sep 29 11:40:01 2005
From: randallm at fidmail.com (Randall M)
Subject: Suggestion for IDS

Michael,
I value your opinion on this subject as my knowledge about IDS is slim. Your
suggestion below as I understand you basically says, from a company stand
point, IDS is not a solution? We were thinking in this line of using IDS
along with IPS system too. We basically have nothing to inspect the high
bandwidth usage or catching infection from mobile or desktops users and
thought IDS and IPS would help. Your thought?

Thank You
Randall M

=====================

"You too can have your very own Computer!"

Note: Side effects include: 
Blue screens; interrupt violation;
illegal operations; remote code
exploitations; virus and mailware infestations;
and other unknown vulnerabilities.

::::-----Original Message-----
::::From: full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk 
::::[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@...ts.grok.org.uk] On 
::::Behalf Of Michael Holstein
::::Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:24 AM
::::To: full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
::::Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Suggestion for IDS
::::
::::> Our company plan to install IDS to protect our resources, 
::::I'm already 
::::> read about snort as NIDS, but, that's software based. I'm 
::::interesting 
::::> with hardware based that will work transparently with our 
::::Cisco PIX, 
::::> no need to make changes in our firewall. What's your suggestion.
::::
::::My first piece of advice on this is to ignore any company 
::::that says they deliver a "turnkey" solution. Such a thing 
::::doesn't exist.
::::
::::Any IDS will work with any firewall .. unless, of course, 
::::you want to connect the two together (eg: dynamically ACL 
::::the PIX based on what the IDS sees). That, IMHO, is an 
::::invitation do DOS yourself (think .. I spoof a packet that 
::::--looks like an attack-- from your upstream router, or smtp 
::::server, etc). There's dozens of ways to do this, including 
::::free with snort.
::::
::::You can also examine snort's "inline" mode in which you 
::::setup bridging between two interfaces, and let snort 
::::"decide" which packets to forward. 
::::In order to make such a thing redundant, be prepared to do 
::::some fancy H/A stuff with a pair of servers.
::::
::::And don't forget .. an IDS is certianly not "fix and 
::::forget" .. it requires daily tinkering (new sigs come out 
::::daily .. and they're almost always noisy and require 
::::tuning). In most any decent sized network, having a 
::::dedicated admin to chase the IDS alerts and keep an eye on 
::::things is almost a given.
::::
::::And as for having an IDS "protect" your network .. well .. 
::::forget that. 
::::An IDS is great for statistical research and forensics .. 
::::but with botnets and whatnot going SSL, you're 
::::time/resources are much better spent finding your 
::::vulnerabilities and patching your hosts.
::::
::::My $0.02.
::::
::::
::::Cheers,
::::
::::Michael Holstein CISSP GCIA
::::Cleveland State University
::::_______________________________________________
::::Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
::::Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
::::Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
::::