full-disclosure - Suggestion for IDS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <588309C1DD14380068C688DC@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
Date: Thu Sep 29 00:22:30 2005
From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Paul Schmehl)
Subject: Suggestion for IDS 

--On Wednesday, September 28, 2005 18:49:32 +0200 Jan Nielsen 
<jan@...akasha.dk> wrote:

> Hi Pauk
>
> Can i ask what you were doing that a pix could not handle nat wise ?
> just wondering since I have done very extensive and complex nat'ing in
> pix'es from 506's up to 535's without any performance problems.
>
Many different things, none of which I'd prefer to discuss on a list. 
Suffice it to say that we make extremely heavy use of both NAT and PAT, 
with subnetting, over a large address space with a lot of traffic.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/