full-disclosure - Careless Law Enforcement ComputerForensicsLacking InfoSec Expertise Causes Suicides

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <003b01c5c9f3$9cc836d0$5601010a@P4>
Date: Wed Oct  5 22:27:56 2005
From: full-disclosure at pchandyman.com.au (Greg)
Subject: Careless Law Enforcement
	ComputerForensicsLacking InfoSec Expertise Causes Suicides

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lane Weast" <lweast@...clerk.org>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk>
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 11:38 PM
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Careless Law Enforcement 
ComputerForensicsLacking InfoSec Expertise Causes Suicides

> In theory, what you say is incorrect.

> They may take you in but, in court they have to prove it was yours.
> It is not your responsibility to prove your innocence.
> It is their responsibility to prove your guilt.

In theory YOU are correct also but that implies a belief that the court 
system:

1) Never gets it wrong.

2) Is not compromised.

3) Is not overwhelmed by political ambitions attempting to make "an arrest" 
in order to make headlines.

If none of that is the case, you are still left with the old case of "throw 
shit and it sticks". Eg, if you are accused, you are always suspect even if 
the case is never proven. Try to get a good job in a sensitive area 
thereafter.

Greg.