full-disclosure - Comparing Algorithms On The List OfHard-to-brut-force?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <576B0A1B-3A88-4F1A-9705-A2D122F68FC0@uic.edu>
Date: Tue Nov  1 19:04:36 2005
From: jlongs2 at uic.edu (James Longstreet)
Subject: Comparing Algorithms On The List
	OfHard-to-brut-force?


On Nov 1, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Brandon Enright wrote:

> IIRC, there aren't any good known attacks against Blowfish, AES, or  
> Twofish
> so the *RIGHT* algorithm is whatever works best for your application.

Depending on the situation, there may be a feasible cache-timing  
attack on software implementations of AES: http://cr.yp.to/ 
antiforgery/cachetiming-20050414.pdf