full-disclosure - Return of the Phrack High Council

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4388AC1F.3070307@ebay.com>
Date: Sat Nov 26 18:40:37 2005
From: mkleinpeter at ebay.com (Mike Klein)
Subject: Return of the Phrack High Council

And yet you quoted netdev's entire email for no good reason 
whatsoever...another breach of supposed netiquette.

Top vs. bottom posting is a bunch of crap. With 20 years experience in 
computing I have yet to see consensus on this issue....regardless of 
wikipedia definition.

I subscribe to numerous mail lists/etc. and far prefer top posts...less 
scrolling to bottom too see what is being said. If people snipped orig 
post than bottom posting would <possibly> be preferrable...but quite 
often this isn't the case...and very often extremely verbose crap like 
images/etc. (dammit' mom get with the program) is often left in as well.

mike klein

Kyle Lutze wrote:
> now, can't you post correctly in a mailing list? 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/top_posting I mean come on, a computer 
> guru not knowing about that?
>
> anyway, hi list!
>
> Kyle
>