lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat Nov 26 18:40:37 2005 From: mkleinpeter at ebay.com (Mike Klein) Subject: Return of the Phrack High Council And yet you quoted netdev's entire email for no good reason whatsoever...another breach of supposed netiquette. Top vs. bottom posting is a bunch of crap. With 20 years experience in computing I have yet to see consensus on this issue....regardless of wikipedia definition. I subscribe to numerous mail lists/etc. and far prefer top posts...less scrolling to bottom too see what is being said. If people snipped orig post than bottom posting would <possibly> be preferrable...but quite often this isn't the case...and very often extremely verbose crap like images/etc. (dammit' mom get with the program) is often left in as well. mike klein Kyle Lutze wrote: > now, can't you post correctly in a mailing list? > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/top_posting I mean come on, a computer > guru not knowing about that? > > anyway, hi list! > > Kyle >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists