full-disclosure - Return of the Phrack High Council

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat Nov 26 18:49:10 2005
From: kyle at randomvoids.com (Kyle Lutze)
Subject: Return of the Phrack High Council

yeah, that was a slight accident, the first one I composed only went to 
him since I didn't hit reply-all, and didn't fully edit the second one. :/

ok, so I'm a bit of a hypocrite sometimes too. Also, I didn't mean to 
say wikipedia's definition was a way to go, I was just using that to 
show my reason without having to put it all in

Kyle

Mike Klein wrote:
> And yet you quoted netdev's entire email for no good reason 
> whatsoever...another breach of supposed netiquette.
> 
> Top vs. bottom posting is a bunch of crap. With 20 years experience in 
> computing I have yet to see consensus on this issue....regardless of 
> wikipedia definition.
> 
> I subscribe to numerous mail lists/etc. and far prefer top posts...less 
> scrolling to bottom too see what is being said. If people snipped orig 
> post than bottom posting would <possibly> be preferrable...but quite 
> often this isn't the case...and very often extremely verbose crap like 
> images/etc. (dammit' mom get with the program) is often left in as well.
> 
> mike klein
> 
> Kyle Lutze wrote:
> 
>> now, can't you post correctly in a mailing list? 
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/top_posting I mean come on, a computer 
>> guru not knowing about that?