full-disclosure - a call for full-disclosure to become a moderated list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2be58a30512150738h504f93d5i2867c39dbbc9ffe5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu Dec 15 15:39:10 2005
From: infosecbofh at gmail.com (InfoSecBOFH)
Subject: a call for full-disclosure to become a
	moderated list

Wow, we have another n3td3v here.  Editing your emails?  Sorry, not
guilty.  Replying to you on list so everyone can see you continue to
stir the pot, guilty.

My momma did not teach my any manners but I taught your momma that
thing she does with her tongue.

On 12/14/05, mis@...den.com <mis@...den.com> wrote:
> didn't your mamma teach you any manners?
>
> call me whatever you want, i will not reply to you on the list.
>
> taking private email and posting it on a list is not polite.
> editing it to remove context is even less polite.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:58:41PM -0800, InfoSecBOFH wrote:
> > Hey cry baby, the only reason this list exists and has half the
> > subscribers it has is because of the lack of moderation.  If this list
> > was moderated it would be nothing more than Bugtraq
> >
> > On 12/14/05, mis@...den.com <mis@...den.com> wrote:
> > > it seems to me that without a moderator (since there is the apparent
> > > absence of people who are moderate, or even civilized), this list will
> > > continue its degeneration into a never-ending pissing contest.
> > >
> > > (some people don't seem to think that the social compact one accepts
> > > when joining a list applies to them.
> > >
> > > my most recent attempt to politely, in direct email, ask one of the
> > > offenders to stop doing this sort of thing on the list ...  was posted
> > > with a twerpy reply right back to the list).  (no good deed goes
> > > unpunished).
> > >
> > > how many people who actually find value in this list (which i have,
> > > since len rose set it up quite a long time ago) agree with this
> > > position?
> > >
> > > if you think there's a compelling reason for no moderation, i'd like to hear it.
> > >
> > > i call to your attention three brief selections from the list charter,
> > > which is at
> > > http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > which i think have been violated recently:
> > >
> > > "Members are expected to maintain a reasonable standard of netiquette when posting to the list."
> > > "Disagreements, flames, arguments, and off-topic discussion should be taken off-list wherever possible."
> > > "Gratuitous advertisement, product placement, or self-promotion is forbidden."
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > >
>