full-disclosure - Moderated lists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1c3fa2270512151012p6f658590q125f2c6a2869fef8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu Dec 15 18:13:04 2005
From: yahooinsider at gmail.com (Joe Average)
Subject: Moderated lists

On 12/15/05,12/15/05, Andy Lindeman <alindeman@...il.com> wrote:
>
>   If the ultimate goal is to keep the "crap" factor down, moderation
> > will only add to the time it takes to read this list and increase the
> > noise ratio.
> >
> > --A
> >
> a) moderate one user (turns list into bugtraq)
b) real disclosure is full-disclosure (bugtraq style modertation must be
avoided)
c) even with the noise, we can all live with it (at least until the end of
the month)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20051215/e7bb7c5e/attachment.html