full-disclosure - Re: Moderated lists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dnv0hr$547$1@sea.gmane.org>
Date: Fri Dec 16 18:26:02 2005
From: davek_throwaway at hotmail.com (Dave Korn)
Subject: Re: Moderated lists

FullDis.20.mandoskippy@...mgourmet.com wrote in
news:D69299EC1906F7459F298BAC6EAD4AA66B05@...ver.OMERNIK.LOCAL

> Yes, it would make it only marginally more difficult, but instead of
> getting 50 emails calling a troll immature (the actual feedback they are
> looking to get) They get no feedback, just "Vote to remove netdev or
> what ever"  based on a certain number, if it is reached, then the person
> has to go create an account.  Eventually, without the flames to the
> original troll,

  Except, of course, that that isn't remotely how it would work.  As you
have seen, people can't resist replying with a flame to a troll.  Yes,
people would go off and vote, but then they'd come back, and post flames to
the troll about how they'd just been voting and he was gonna get his ass
kicked off the list.  We'd still have just the same amount of noise as ever.

  Personally I love it, reminds me of usenet on a good day.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....